Skip to main content Skip to primary navigation
Resource detail
Citations

2025/038: Whether parties identified in a notice to fix were specified persons, the adequacy of the remedies in the notice and the timeframe provided for in the notice - 303A Fenton St, Thames, Coromandel

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 1.1MB)
Abbreviation
2025/038
Valid from
6/08/2025
Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment,
Information type
Determination,
Format
PDF,
Description

This determination considers the issuing of a notice to fix for retaining wall works.

It examines whether the director of the owning company was correctly identified as a specified person under section 163, the adequacy of the remedies proposed in the notice, and the reasonableness of the four-month compliance timeframe. 

Decision

In accordance with section 188 of the Building Act 2004, it has been determined that the notice was to be modified to remove the director as a specified person.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 1.1MB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2025/038: Whether parties identified in a notice to fix were specified persons, the adequacy of the remedies in the notice and the timeframe provided for in the notice - 303A Fenton St, Thames, Coromandel

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2025/038: Whether parties identified in a notice to fix were specified persons, the adequacy of the remedies in the notice and the timeframe provided for in the notice - 303A Fenton St, Thames, Coromandel

Description

This determination considers the issuing of a notice to fix for retaining wall works.

It examines whether the director of the owning company was correctly identified as a specified person under section 163, the adequacy of the remedies proposed in the notice, and the reasonableness of the four-month compliance timeframe. 

Decision

In accordance with section 188 of the Building Act 2004, it has been determined that the notice was to be modified to remove the director as a specified person.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 1.1MB)
2025/038: Whether parties identified in a notice to fix were specified persons, the adequacy of the remedies in the notice and the timeframe provided for in the notice - 303A Fenton St, Thames, Coromandel
Description

This determination considers the issuing of a notice to fix for retaining wall works.

It examines whether the director of the owning company was correctly identified as a specified person under section 163, the adequacy of the remedies proposed in the notice, and the reasonableness of the four-month compliance timeframe. 

Decision

In accordance with section 188 of the Building Act 2004, it has been determined that the notice was to be modified to remove the director as a specified person.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 1.1MB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2025/038: Whether parties identified in a notice to fix were specified persons, the adequacy of the remedies in the notice and the timeframe provided for in the notice - 303A Fenton St, Thames, Coromandel

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback