2009/015: The code compliance of a 15 year-old house

Abbreviation
2009/015
Valid from
10/03/2009

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment,
Information type
Determination,
Format
PDF,

Description

This determination arises from a dispute regarding the code-compliance of a 15-year-old house with various clauses of the Building Code.

The matters for determination in terms of sections 177(a), 177(b)(i), 177(e) and 1883 of the Act are:

  • whether the building consents granted by the authority for the house in 1993 and the additions in 1994 should be reversed
  • whether certain building elements of the original house comply with the Building Code (Schedule 1 of the Building Regulations 1992) that applied at the time the building consent was granted
  • whether certain building elements of the attached garage and the decks with roofs ('the decks') comply with the Building Code that applied at the time the building consents were granted
  • whether the decisions of the authority to issue code compliance certificates for the attached garage and decks were correct
  • whether the authority should have exercised its powers under section 124 in the context of an insanitary building.

The application as set out in Form D1 has also raised matters relating to the authority's decisions regarding:

  • the refusal to issue a notice to fix
  • the refusal to issue documents necessary for the demolition and rebuilding of the house.

However, apart from the matter of a demolition notice discussed, these are not matters within the Chief Executive's remit in section 177 of the Act.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
Notes/comments

Note: The decisions in this Determination were confirmed on appeal to the District Court. See: Ratima v Tauranga District Council and Habitat for Humanity Limited (District Court, Tauranga, Judge Ingram, 10 February 2009, CIV-2008-070-000326).

Appeal judgment

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 164KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.

Note: The decisions in this Determination were confirmed on appeal to the District Court. See: Ratima v Tauranga District Council and Habitat for Humanity Limited (District Court, Tauranga, Judge Ingram, 10 February 2009, CIV-2008-070-000326).

Appeal judgment

This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2009/015: The code compliance of a 15 year-old house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2009/015: The code compliance of a 15 year-old house

Description

This determination arises from a dispute regarding the code-compliance of a 15-year-old house with various clauses of the Building Code.

The matters for determination in terms of sections 177(a), 177(b)(i), 177(e) and 1883 of the Act are:

  • whether the building consents granted by the authority for the house in 1993 and the additions in 1994 should be reversed
  • whether certain building elements of the original house comply with the Building Code (Schedule 1 of the Building Regulations 1992) that applied at the time the building consent was granted
  • whether certain building elements of the attached garage and the decks with roofs ('the decks') comply with the Building Code that applied at the time the building consents were granted
  • whether the decisions of the authority to issue code compliance certificates for the attached garage and decks were correct
  • whether the authority should have exercised its powers under section 124 in the context of an insanitary building.

The application as set out in Form D1 has also raised matters relating to the authority's decisions regarding:

  • the refusal to issue a notice to fix
  • the refusal to issue documents necessary for the demolition and rebuilding of the house.

However, apart from the matter of a demolition notice discussed, these are not matters within the Chief Executive's remit in section 177 of the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 164KB)
2009/015: The code compliance of a 15 year-old house
Description

This determination arises from a dispute regarding the code-compliance of a 15-year-old house with various clauses of the Building Code.

The matters for determination in terms of sections 177(a), 177(b)(i), 177(e) and 1883 of the Act are:

  • whether the building consents granted by the authority for the house in 1993 and the additions in 1994 should be reversed
  • whether certain building elements of the original house comply with the Building Code (Schedule 1 of the Building Regulations 1992) that applied at the time the building consent was granted
  • whether certain building elements of the attached garage and the decks with roofs ('the decks') comply with the Building Code that applied at the time the building consents were granted
  • whether the decisions of the authority to issue code compliance certificates for the attached garage and decks were correct
  • whether the authority should have exercised its powers under section 124 in the context of an insanitary building.

The application as set out in Form D1 has also raised matters relating to the authority's decisions regarding:

  • the refusal to issue a notice to fix
  • the refusal to issue documents necessary for the demolition and rebuilding of the house.

However, apart from the matter of a demolition notice discussed, these are not matters within the Chief Executive's remit in section 177 of the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 164KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2009/015: The code compliance of a 15 year-old house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback