Skip to main content Skip to primary navigation
Resource detail
Citations

2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 359KB)
Abbreviation
2015/013
Valid from
10/04/2015
Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF
Description

This determination arises from a dispute between the parties as to which Acceptable Solution (C/AS1 or C/AS2) applies to the proposed building work for the purposes of achieving compliance with Clause C of the Building Code.

The owner is of the view that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SH, and that therefore C/AS1 applies.

The authority's view is that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SM and that C/AS2 applies; for this reason the authority has refused to grant building consent.

The matter to be determined is whether the proposed building work complies with Clause C of the Building Code and whether the authority was correct in its refusal to grant the building consent.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 359KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park

Description

This determination arises from a dispute between the parties as to which Acceptable Solution (C/AS1 or C/AS2) applies to the proposed building work for the purposes of achieving compliance with Clause C of the Building Code.

The owner is of the view that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SH, and that therefore C/AS1 applies.

The authority's view is that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SM and that C/AS2 applies; for this reason the authority has refused to grant building consent.

The matter to be determined is whether the proposed building work complies with Clause C of the Building Code and whether the authority was correct in its refusal to grant the building consent.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 359KB)
2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park
Description

This determination arises from a dispute between the parties as to which Acceptable Solution (C/AS1 or C/AS2) applies to the proposed building work for the purposes of achieving compliance with Clause C of the Building Code.

The owner is of the view that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SH, and that therefore C/AS1 applies.

The authority's view is that the proposed building work falls within Risk Group SM and that C/AS2 applies; for this reason the authority has refused to grant building consent.

The matter to be determined is whether the proposed building work complies with Clause C of the Building Code and whether the authority was correct in its refusal to grant the building consent.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 359KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2015/013: Regarding a dispute about which fire risk group should be used in determining compliance of proposed accommodation at a holiday park

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback