2013/005: Regarding the refusal to grant building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

Abbreviation
2013/005
Valid from
5/02/2013

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority was of the view that the installation would not comply with the Building Code and would adversely affect the house. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant building consent. In considering this matter, it must be considered whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2013/005: Regarding the refusal to grant building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2013/005: Regarding the refusal to grant building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority was of the view that the installation would not comply with the Building Code and would adversely affect the house. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant building consent. In considering this matter, it must be considered whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2013/005: Regarding the refusal to grant building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house
Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority was of the view that the installation would not comply with the Building Code and would adversely affect the house. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant building consent. In considering this matter, it must be considered whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2013/005: Regarding the refusal to grant building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback