Save

2016/012: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to a house with asbestos cladding

Abbreviation
2016/012
Valid from
04/04/2016

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to the house because the installation was not done in accordance with the consent and the authority was also not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992).

The matter to be determined is therefore the authority's exercise of its powers of decision in refusing to issue the code compliance certificate. The authority's letter to the installer dated 7 August 2013 was taken as being the reason for its refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the house. In that letter, the authority set out its concerns as relating to the weathertightness of the cladding.

 

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 213KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2016/012: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to a house with asbestos cladding

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2016/012: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to a house with asbestos cladding

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to the house because the installation was not done in accordance with the consent and the authority was also not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992).

The matter to be determined is therefore the authority's exercise of its powers of decision in refusing to issue the code compliance certificate. The authority's letter to the installer dated 7 August 2013 was taken as being the reason for its refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the house. In that letter, the authority set out its concerns as relating to the weathertightness of the cladding.

 

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 213KB)
2016/012: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to a house with asbestos cladding
Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to the house because the installation was not done in accordance with the consent and the authority was also not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992).

The matter to be determined is therefore the authority's exercise of its powers of decision in refusing to issue the code compliance certificate. The authority's letter to the installer dated 7 August 2013 was taken as being the reason for its refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the house. In that letter, the authority set out its concerns as relating to the weathertightness of the cladding.

 

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 213KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2016/012: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for the retrofitting of urea formaldehyde foam insulation to a house with asbestos cladding

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback