2015/019: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 13 year-old house with masonry veneer

Abbreviation
2015/019
Valid from
5/05/2015

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This determination arises from a decision of the authority to refuse to grant an amendment to a building consent for the substitution of aluminium window and door joinery with uPVC joinery to a partially-constructed house because it is not satisfied that the uPVC joinery will comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's concerns relate to the joinery's installation, weathertightness detailing, and durability.

The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue an amended building consent for the uPVC joinery. In deciding this, consideration was given to whether the substituted window and door joinery as it is proposed to be installed will comply with Clauses B1 Structure, B2 Durability, and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code.

 

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 325KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2015/019: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 13 year-old house with masonry veneer

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2015/019: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 13 year-old house with masonry veneer

Description

This determination arises from a decision of the authority to refuse to grant an amendment to a building consent for the substitution of aluminium window and door joinery with uPVC joinery to a partially-constructed house because it is not satisfied that the uPVC joinery will comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's concerns relate to the joinery's installation, weathertightness detailing, and durability.

The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue an amended building consent for the uPVC joinery. In deciding this, consideration was given to whether the substituted window and door joinery as it is proposed to be installed will comply with Clauses B1 Structure, B2 Durability, and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code.

 

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 325KB)
2015/019: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 13 year-old house with masonry veneer
Description

This determination arises from a decision of the authority to refuse to grant an amendment to a building consent for the substitution of aluminium window and door joinery with uPVC joinery to a partially-constructed house because it is not satisfied that the uPVC joinery will comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's concerns relate to the joinery's installation, weathertightness detailing, and durability.

The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue an amended building consent for the uPVC joinery. In deciding this, consideration was given to whether the substituted window and door joinery as it is proposed to be installed will comply with Clauses B1 Structure, B2 Durability, and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code.

 

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 325KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2015/019: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 13 year-old house with masonry veneer

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback