Save

2013/050: The refusal to grant a building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

Abbreviation
2013/050
Valid from
02/09/2013

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority is of the view that the installation will not comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant a building consent. In considering this matter, I must consider whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 149KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2013/050: The refusal to grant a building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2013/050: The refusal to grant a building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority is of the view that the installation will not comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant a building consent. In considering this matter, I must consider whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 149KB)
2013/050: The refusal to grant a building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house
Description

The determination arises from a decision made by the authority to refuse to grant building consent for proposed building work that consisted of retrofitting urea formaldehyde foam insulation in the external walls of the applicants' house. The authority is of the view that the installation will not comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act. Therefore, the matter to be determined is whether the authority correctly exercised its powers in refusing to grant a building consent. In considering this matter, I must consider whether there was sufficient evidence provided in the building consent application for the authority to conclude on reasonable grounds that the building work and the existing building (as altered) would comply with Clauses E2.3.5 and E2.3.6 of the Building Code to the extent required by the Act.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 149KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2013/050: The refusal to grant a building consent for retrofitting foam wall insulation in a house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback