Save

2011/065: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 12 year-old house

Abbreviation
2011/065
Valid from
30/06/2011

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This second determination arose because while remedial work to the house described in the first determination was suitably carried out and inspected by the authority to its satisfaction, the authority continued to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the repaired house because it was not satisfied that the house complied with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the original elements of the house, and
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue the code compliance certificate.

This determination was limited to the matters defined above and did not consider the completed remedial work.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 73KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2011/065: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 12 year-old house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2011/065: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 12 year-old house

Description

This second determination arose because while remedial work to the house described in the first determination was suitably carried out and inspected by the authority to its satisfaction, the authority continued to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the repaired house because it was not satisfied that the house complied with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the original elements of the house, and
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue the code compliance certificate.

This determination was limited to the matters defined above and did not consider the completed remedial work.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 73KB)
2011/065: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 12 year-old house
Description

This second determination arose because while remedial work to the house described in the first determination was suitably carried out and inspected by the authority to its satisfaction, the authority continued to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the repaired house because it was not satisfied that the house complied with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the original elements of the house, and
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue the code compliance certificate.

This determination was limited to the matters defined above and did not consider the completed remedial work.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 73KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2011/065: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 12 year-old house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback