2010/138: The refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5 year-old house

Abbreviation
2010/138
Valid from
23/12/2010

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The matter arose from the authority's decision to issue a notice to fix in respect of a house that was consented in 2004 because it believed the house did not comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority's decisions to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate and to issue a notice to fix were correct.

It was considered whether the house complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture of the New Zealand Building Code.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 253KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2010/138: The refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5 year-old house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2010/138: The refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5 year-old house

Description

The matter arose from the authority's decision to issue a notice to fix in respect of a house that was consented in 2004 because it believed the house did not comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority's decisions to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate and to issue a notice to fix were correct.

It was considered whether the house complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture of the New Zealand Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 253KB)
2010/138: The refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5 year-old house
Description

The matter arose from the authority's decision to issue a notice to fix in respect of a house that was consented in 2004 because it believed the house did not comply with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority's decisions to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate and to issue a notice to fix were correct.

It was considered whether the house complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture of the New Zealand Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 253KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2010/138: The refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5 year-old house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback