Skip to main content Skip to primary navigation
Resource detail
Citations

2010/111: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house and cottage with monolithic cladding

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
Abbreviation
2010/111
Valid from
15/11/2010
Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF
Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house and cottage because it was not satisfied that the buildings complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue code compliance certificates for the buildings for the reasons provided to the applicant.

In deciding this, it was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the buildings complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the buildings.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2010/111: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house and cottage with monolithic cladding

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2010/111: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house and cottage with monolithic cladding

Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house and cottage because it was not satisfied that the buildings complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue code compliance certificates for the buildings for the reasons provided to the applicant.

In deciding this, it was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the buildings complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the buildings.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2010/111: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house and cottage with monolithic cladding
Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house and cottage because it was not satisfied that the buildings complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The matter determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue code compliance certificates for the buildings for the reasons provided to the applicant.

In deciding this, it was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the buildings complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the elements that make up the building work complied with Building Code Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the buildings.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2010/111: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house and cottage with monolithic cladding

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback