Save

2009/028: Determination regarding the code compliance of a 9- year-old addition

Abbreviation
2009/028
Valid from
20/04/2009

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate because it is not satisfied the work complies with the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992). The authority contends that because what is built ('the addition') is not in accordance with the consented drawings, and is consequently an inhabited area, rather than a 'storeroom', the work may not meet the requirements of Building Code Clause E2.

The decision is disputed by the applicants. The matters to be determined, in terms of sections 177(a) of the Act, are:

  1. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause E2 'External Moisture';
  2. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clauses F2 'Hazardous Building Materials';
  3. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause B2 'Durability', taking into account the age of the building work.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 95KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2009/028: Determination regarding the code compliance of a 9- year-old addition

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2009/028: Determination regarding the code compliance of a 9- year-old addition

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate because it is not satisfied the work complies with the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992). The authority contends that because what is built ('the addition') is not in accordance with the consented drawings, and is consequently an inhabited area, rather than a 'storeroom', the work may not meet the requirements of Building Code Clause E2.

The decision is disputed by the applicants. The matters to be determined, in terms of sections 177(a) of the Act, are:

  1. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause E2 'External Moisture';
  2. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clauses F2 'Hazardous Building Materials';
  3. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause B2 'Durability', taking into account the age of the building work.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 95KB)
2009/028: Determination regarding the code compliance of a 9- year-old addition
Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate because it is not satisfied the work complies with the Building Code (First Schedule, Building Regulations 1992). The authority contends that because what is built ('the addition') is not in accordance with the consented drawings, and is consequently an inhabited area, rather than a 'storeroom', the work may not meet the requirements of Building Code Clause E2.

The decision is disputed by the applicants. The matters to be determined, in terms of sections 177(a) of the Act, are:

  1. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause E2 'External Moisture';
  2. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clauses F2 'Hazardous Building Materials';
  3. Whether the addition complies with Building Code Clause B2 'Durability', taking into account the age of the building work.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 95KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2009/028: Determination regarding the code compliance of a 9- year-old addition

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback