Save

2006/090: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building clad with vertical board and batten cladding

Abbreviation
2006/090
Valid from
18/09/2006

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The dispute for determination was whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the vertical boards and battens to the walls of the house complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code and other elements of the building complied with clause B2.

The questions to be determined were:

  1. Whether the board and batten cladding as installed to the walls of the building complied with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act).
  2. Whether certain building elements, which have 5 or 15-year, or the life of the building, being not less than 50 years, durability requirements, complied with clause B2 of the building code considering the time that elapsed since the elements were constructed.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 167KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2006/090: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building clad with vertical board and batten cladding

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2006/090: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building clad with vertical board and batten cladding

Description

The dispute for determination was whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the vertical boards and battens to the walls of the house complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code and other elements of the building complied with clause B2.

The questions to be determined were:

  1. Whether the board and batten cladding as installed to the walls of the building complied with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act).
  2. Whether certain building elements, which have 5 or 15-year, or the life of the building, being not less than 50 years, durability requirements, complied with clause B2 of the building code considering the time that elapsed since the elements were constructed.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 167KB)
2006/090: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building clad with vertical board and batten cladding
Description

The dispute for determination was whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the vertical boards and battens to the walls of the house complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code and other elements of the building complied with clause B2.

The questions to be determined were:

  1. Whether the board and batten cladding as installed to the walls of the building complied with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act).
  2. Whether certain building elements, which have 5 or 15-year, or the life of the building, being not less than 50 years, durability requirements, complied with clause B2 of the building code considering the time that elapsed since the elements were constructed.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 167KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2006/090: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building clad with vertical board and batten cladding

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback