Save

2006/079: Dispute about the addition of a fixed seat to a deck

Abbreviation
2006/079
Valid from
29/08/2006

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The dispute arose because the territorial authority did not believe that the addition of a fixed seat to a deck, that would otherwise not require a barrier, complied with clause F4 - Safety from Falling of the Building Code.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 113KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2006/079: Dispute about the addition of a fixed seat to a deck

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2006/079: Dispute about the addition of a fixed seat to a deck

Description

The dispute arose because the territorial authority did not believe that the addition of a fixed seat to a deck, that would otherwise not require a barrier, complied with clause F4 - Safety from Falling of the Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 113KB)
2006/079: Dispute about the addition of a fixed seat to a deck
Description

The dispute arose because the territorial authority did not believe that the addition of a fixed seat to a deck, that would otherwise not require a barrier, complied with clause F4 - Safety from Falling of the Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 113KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2006/079: Dispute about the addition of a fixed seat to a deck

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback