2004/50: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a 'monolithic' cladding system: House 36

Abbreviation
2004/50
Valid from
23/09/2004

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This was a determination by the Building Industry Authority of a dispute referred to it under section 17 of the Building Act 1991. 

The applicants were the two owners of the property and the other party was the territorial authority.

The application arose from the refusal by the territorial authority to issue a code compliance certificate for a new house unless changes were made to its monolithic cladding system.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2004/50: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a 'monolithic' cladding system: House 36

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2004/50: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a 'monolithic' cladding system: House 36

Description

This was a determination by the Building Industry Authority of a dispute referred to it under section 17 of the Building Act 1991. 

The applicants were the two owners of the property and the other party was the territorial authority.

The application arose from the refusal by the territorial authority to issue a code compliance certificate for a new house unless changes were made to its monolithic cladding system.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2004/50: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a 'monolithic' cladding system: House 36
Description

This was a determination by the Building Industry Authority of a dispute referred to it under section 17 of the Building Act 1991. 

The applicants were the two owners of the property and the other party was the territorial authority.

The application arose from the refusal by the territorial authority to issue a code compliance certificate for a new house unless changes were made to its monolithic cladding system.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2004/50: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a 'monolithic' cladding system: House 36

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback