2011/098: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house

Abbreviation
2011/098
Valid from
17/11/2011

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This second determination arose because the authority continued to refuse to issue to issue a code compliance certificate for the house because it is not satisfied that:

  • the repairs to certain windows complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of drainage gaps; and
  • the new membrane to the upper deck complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of an inspection prior to installation of the membrane and the lack of a producer statement.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • Whether the windows installed to walls with monolithic cladding fixed directly to the framing comply with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code; and
  • whether the recently installed deck membrane required a producer statement to support its compliance with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 51KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2011/098: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2011/098: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house

Description

This second determination arose because the authority continued to refuse to issue to issue a code compliance certificate for the house because it is not satisfied that:

  • the repairs to certain windows complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of drainage gaps; and
  • the new membrane to the upper deck complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of an inspection prior to installation of the membrane and the lack of a producer statement.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • Whether the windows installed to walls with monolithic cladding fixed directly to the framing comply with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code; and
  • whether the recently installed deck membrane required a producer statement to support its compliance with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 51KB)
2011/098: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house
Description

This second determination arose because the authority continued to refuse to issue to issue a code compliance certificate for the house because it is not satisfied that:

  • the repairs to certain windows complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of drainage gaps; and
  • the new membrane to the upper deck complied with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code, due to the lack of an inspection prior to installation of the membrane and the lack of a producer statement.

The matters to be determined were therefore:

  • Whether the windows installed to walls with monolithic cladding fixed directly to the framing comply with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code; and
  • whether the recently installed deck membrane required a producer statement to support its compliance with Clauses B2 and E2 of the Building Code.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 51KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2011/098: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8 year-old house

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback