Skip to main content Skip to primary navigation
Resource detail
Citations

2010/099: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a house with monolithic and brick veneer cladding

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
Abbreviation
2010/099
Valid from
16/10/2010
Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Author
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF
Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house, because it was not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's primary concerns about the compliance of the building related to its age and to the weathertightness of the cladding.

The determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the building work.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the house complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture;
  2. Whether the building elements complied with Clause B2 Durability , taking into account the age of the house.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2010/099: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a house with monolithic and brick veneer cladding

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2010/099: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a house with monolithic and brick veneer cladding

Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house, because it was not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's primary concerns about the compliance of the building related to its age and to the weathertightness of the cladding.

The determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the building work.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the house complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture;
  2. Whether the building elements complied with Clause B2 Durability , taking into account the age of the house.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2010/099: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a house with monolithic and brick veneer cladding
Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for an 8-year-old house, because it was not satisfied that the building work complied with certain clauses of the Building Code.

The authority's primary concerns about the compliance of the building related to its age and to the weathertightness of the cladding.

The determined was whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the building work.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external claddings to the house complied with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture;
  2. Whether the building elements complied with Clause B2 Durability , taking into account the age of the house.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2010/099: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a house with monolithic and brick veneer cladding

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback