2010/091: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10 year-old block of shops and apartments

Abbreviation
2010/091
Valid from
27/09/2010

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment,
Author
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination,
Format
PDF,

Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the applicants' 10-year-old building, which contains four shops and four apartments, because it was not satisfied that the building complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture and E3 Internal Moisture of the Building Code.

The matter determined was therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external envelope of the building complied with Clause E2 External Moisture and Clause B2 Durability (insofar as it relates to Clause E2);
  2. Whether the ventilation of the sub-floor area complied with Clause E2 External moisture, and
  3. whether the toilet ventilation complied with Clause G4 Ventilation;
  4. Whether the elements that make up the building work comply with Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the building work.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2010/091: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10 year-old block of shops and apartments

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2010/091: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10 year-old block of shops and apartments

Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the applicants' 10-year-old building, which contains four shops and four apartments, because it was not satisfied that the building complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture and E3 Internal Moisture of the Building Code.

The matter determined was therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external envelope of the building complied with Clause E2 External Moisture and Clause B2 Durability (insofar as it relates to Clause E2);
  2. Whether the ventilation of the sub-floor area complied with Clause E2 External moisture, and
  3. whether the toilet ventilation complied with Clause G4 Ventilation;
  4. Whether the elements that make up the building work comply with Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the building work.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2010/091: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10 year-old block of shops and apartments
Description

This determination arose from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for the applicants' 10-year-old building, which contains four shops and four apartments, because it was not satisfied that the building complied with Clauses B2 Durability, E2 External Moisture and E3 Internal Moisture of the Building Code.

The matter determined was therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate.

It was considered:

  1. Whether the external envelope of the building complied with Clause E2 External Moisture and Clause B2 Durability (insofar as it relates to Clause E2);
  2. Whether the ventilation of the sub-floor area complied with Clause E2 External moisture, and
  3. whether the toilet ventilation complied with Clause G4 Ventilation;
  4. Whether the elements that make up the building work comply with Clause B2 Durability, taking into account the age of the building work.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2010/091: Refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for a 10 year-old block of shops and apartments

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback