Save

2015/006: The code compliance of, and whether consent was required for, a 1.0m high retaining wall adjacent the boundary

Abbreviation
2015/006
Valid from
25/02/2015

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This determination arises from the construction of a retaining wall as part of works carried out to construct a minor household dwelling. The issue arose because:

  • a) the retaining wall was not included in the consented building work and the authority now requires the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall, and
  • b) the authority is not satisfied that the building work complies with certain clauses of the Building Code, in particular in regard to the surcharge.

The matters to be determined are:

  1. Whether the retaining wall as constructed complies with the relevant Clauses of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the authority was correct in the exercise of its powers of decision in requiring the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall. 

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 151KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2015/006: The code compliance of, and whether consent was required for, a 1.0m high retaining wall adjacent the boundary

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2015/006: The code compliance of, and whether consent was required for, a 1.0m high retaining wall adjacent the boundary

Description

This determination arises from the construction of a retaining wall as part of works carried out to construct a minor household dwelling. The issue arose because:

  • a) the retaining wall was not included in the consented building work and the authority now requires the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall, and
  • b) the authority is not satisfied that the building work complies with certain clauses of the Building Code, in particular in regard to the surcharge.

The matters to be determined are:

  1. Whether the retaining wall as constructed complies with the relevant Clauses of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the authority was correct in the exercise of its powers of decision in requiring the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall. 

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 151KB)
2015/006: The code compliance of, and whether consent was required for, a 1.0m high retaining wall adjacent the boundary
Description

This determination arises from the construction of a retaining wall as part of works carried out to construct a minor household dwelling. The issue arose because:

  • a) the retaining wall was not included in the consented building work and the authority now requires the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall, and
  • b) the authority is not satisfied that the building work complies with certain clauses of the Building Code, in particular in regard to the surcharge.

The matters to be determined are:

  1. Whether the retaining wall as constructed complies with the relevant Clauses of the Building Code;
  2. Whether the authority was correct in the exercise of its powers of decision in requiring the building consent be amended to include the retaining wall. 
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 151KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2015/006: The code compliance of, and whether consent was required for, a 1.0m high retaining wall adjacent the boundary

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback