Save

2011/051: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for one of a complex of six 16 year-old townhouses

Abbreviation
2011/051
Valid from
30/05/2011

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a 16-year-old townhouse because: it is not satisfied that the building work in Unit 1 complies with certain clauses of the Building Code. The authority's concerns about the compliance of the building work primarily relate to its age and weathertightness. Also the six townhouses (the units) at 8A to 8F Moturoa Street (Unit 1 to Unit 6) in the development were constructed under a single building consent. The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for Unit 1. In deciding this matter, the following must be considered: 1-Whether the external claddings to Unit 1 (the claddings) comply with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code; 2-Whether Unit 1 complies with the remaining relevant clauses of the Building Code, in particular with Clause E3 Internal Moisture; 3-Whether the building elements in Unit 1 comply with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code, taking into account the age of the building work; 4-Whether the authority, in response to an application from the owner, is required to amend the building consent for the development, which includes Unit 1, so that Unit 1 has its own separate building consent. That would make it possible for the authority to issue a code compliance certificate in respect of Unit 1.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 191KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2011/051: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for one of a complex of six 16 year-old townhouses

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2011/051: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for one of a complex of six 16 year-old townhouses

Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a 16-year-old townhouse because: it is not satisfied that the building work in Unit 1 complies with certain clauses of the Building Code. The authority's concerns about the compliance of the building work primarily relate to its age and weathertightness. Also the six townhouses (the units) at 8A to 8F Moturoa Street (Unit 1 to Unit 6) in the development were constructed under a single building consent. The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for Unit 1. In deciding this matter, the following must be considered: 1-Whether the external claddings to Unit 1 (the claddings) comply with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code; 2-Whether Unit 1 complies with the remaining relevant clauses of the Building Code, in particular with Clause E3 Internal Moisture; 3-Whether the building elements in Unit 1 comply with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code, taking into account the age of the building work; 4-Whether the authority, in response to an application from the owner, is required to amend the building consent for the development, which includes Unit 1, so that Unit 1 has its own separate building consent. That would make it possible for the authority to issue a code compliance certificate in respect of Unit 1.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 191KB)
2011/051: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for one of a complex of six 16 year-old townhouses
Description

This determination arises from the decision of the authority to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a 16-year-old townhouse because: it is not satisfied that the building work in Unit 1 complies with certain clauses of the Building Code. The authority's concerns about the compliance of the building work primarily relate to its age and weathertightness. Also the six townhouses (the units) at 8A to 8F Moturoa Street (Unit 1 to Unit 6) in the development were constructed under a single building consent. The matter to be determined is therefore whether the authority was correct to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for Unit 1. In deciding this matter, the following must be considered: 1-Whether the external claddings to Unit 1 (the claddings) comply with Clause B2 Durability and Clause E2 External Moisture of the Building Code; 2-Whether Unit 1 complies with the remaining relevant clauses of the Building Code, in particular with Clause E3 Internal Moisture; 3-Whether the building elements in Unit 1 comply with Clause B2 Durability of the Building Code, taking into account the age of the building work; 4-Whether the authority, in response to an application from the owner, is required to amend the building consent for the development, which includes Unit 1, so that Unit 1 has its own separate building consent. That would make it possible for the authority to issue a code compliance certificate in respect of Unit 1.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 191KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2011/051: Regarding the refusal to issue a code compliance certificate for one of a complex of six 16 year-old townhouses

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback