2010/119: Use of a cover as a barrier to a swimming pool

Abbreviation
2010/119
Valid from
3/12/2010

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The dispute between the parties related to the authority's decision to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a swimming pool constructed on the applicants' property.

The reason given by the authority for this decision was because the fencing around the swimming pool had not been installed as set out in the building consent, and instead the pool had been fitted with a pool cover instead.

 The matter for determination was whether the swimming pool cover complied with Clause F4 of the Building Code.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2010/119: Use of a cover as a barrier to a swimming pool

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2010/119: Use of a cover as a barrier to a swimming pool

Description

The dispute between the parties related to the authority's decision to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a swimming pool constructed on the applicants' property.

The reason given by the authority for this decision was because the fencing around the swimming pool had not been installed as set out in the building consent, and instead the pool had been fitted with a pool cover instead.

 The matter for determination was whether the swimming pool cover complied with Clause F4 of the Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2010/119: Use of a cover as a barrier to a swimming pool
Description

The dispute between the parties related to the authority's decision to refuse to issue a code compliance certificate for a swimming pool constructed on the applicants' property.

The reason given by the authority for this decision was because the fencing around the swimming pool had not been installed as set out in the building consent, and instead the pool had been fitted with a pool cover instead.

 The matter for determination was whether the swimming pool cover complied with Clause F4 of the Building Code.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2010/119: Use of a cover as a barrier to a swimming pool

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback