2009/115: Dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Māori land

Abbreviation
2009/115
Valid from
24/12/2009

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment,
Information type
Determination,
Format
PDF,

Description

This determination arises from a dispute about a house built on a rural block of Maori land by the applicant, who is one shareholder of the jointly owned land.

Based on the evidence, the matters for determination are:

  • whether the authority was correct to impose a condition of demolition or removal on the notice to fix of 25 May 2007 ('the second notice to fix');
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to amend the building consent; whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue a certificate of acceptance.

In order to determine the matters of the refusal of the authority to consider issuing a certificate of acceptance, and the refusal of the authority to consider amending the building consent, it needs to be considered whether the decision of the authority to grant the original building consent was correct.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2009/115: Dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Māori land

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2009/115: Dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Māori land

Description

This determination arises from a dispute about a house built on a rural block of Maori land by the applicant, who is one shareholder of the jointly owned land.

Based on the evidence, the matters for determination are:

  • whether the authority was correct to impose a condition of demolition or removal on the notice to fix of 25 May 2007 ('the second notice to fix');
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to amend the building consent; whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue a certificate of acceptance.

In order to determine the matters of the refusal of the authority to consider issuing a certificate of acceptance, and the refusal of the authority to consider amending the building consent, it needs to be considered whether the decision of the authority to grant the original building consent was correct.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2009/115: Dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Māori land
Description

This determination arises from a dispute about a house built on a rural block of Maori land by the applicant, who is one shareholder of the jointly owned land.

Based on the evidence, the matters for determination are:

  • whether the authority was correct to impose a condition of demolition or removal on the notice to fix of 25 May 2007 ('the second notice to fix');
  • whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to amend the building consent; whether the authority was correct in its decision to refuse to issue a certificate of acceptance.

In order to determine the matters of the refusal of the authority to consider issuing a certificate of acceptance, and the refusal of the authority to consider amending the building consent, it needs to be considered whether the decision of the authority to grant the original building consent was correct.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2009/115: Dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Māori land

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback