Save

2006/045: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a monolithic cladding system

Abbreviation
2006/045
Valid from
24/05/2006

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The dispute for determination is whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the monolithic cladding complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code is correct. The question to be determined, therefore, is whether the monolithic wall cladding as installed to the majority of the timber-framed external walls of the house complies with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act). The remaining areas of the external walls, which are lined with horizontal pre-painted corrugated steel sheeting, have not been referred to by the territorial authority as being an issue for this house. Accordingly consideration of them does not form part of this determination.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2006/045: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a monolithic cladding system

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2006/045: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a monolithic cladding system

Description

The dispute for determination is whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the monolithic cladding complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code is correct. The question to be determined, therefore, is whether the monolithic wall cladding as installed to the majority of the timber-framed external walls of the house complies with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act). The remaining areas of the external walls, which are lined with horizontal pre-painted corrugated steel sheeting, have not been referred to by the territorial authority as being an issue for this house. Accordingly consideration of them does not form part of this determination.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2006/045: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a monolithic cladding system
Description

The dispute for determination is whether the territorial authority's decision to decline to issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old house because it was not satisfied that the monolithic cladding complied with clauses B2 Durability and E2 External Moisture of the Building Code is correct. The question to be determined, therefore, is whether the monolithic wall cladding as installed to the majority of the timber-framed external walls of the house complies with the Building Code (see sections 177 and 188 of the Act). The remaining areas of the external walls, which are lined with horizontal pre-painted corrugated steel sheeting, have not been referred to by the territorial authority as being an issue for this house. Accordingly consideration of them does not form part of this determination.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2006/045: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for a building with a monolithic cladding system

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Save
Feedback