2006/004: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for 48 dwellings with monolithic and weatherboard cladding systems

Abbreviation
2006/004
Valid from
2/02/2006

Information provider
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Information type
Determination
Format
PDF

Description

The application arose because the territorial authority did not issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old complex comprising 48 units .

The questions to be determined were:

1 Whether the following items complied with the Building Code:

  • The monolithic and rusticated Cedar weatherboard wall;
  • The roof claddings;
  • The finished ground levels and secondary flow paths;

2 Whether all building elements, incorporated in the complex, complied with clause B2 of the Building Code, considering the age of the construction.

The applicant in its submissions also requested that the determination address the issues of the acceptability of producer statements and the veracity of certifiers inspection records. The determination process as set out in the Act does not allow a determination of these questions.

For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
For assistance with locating previous versions, please contact the information provider.
This resource is not cited by any other resources.

2006/004: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for 48 dwellings with monolithic and weatherboard cladding systems

This document is not CITED BY any other resources:

2006/004: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for 48 dwellings with monolithic and weatherboard cladding systems

Description

The application arose because the territorial authority did not issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old complex comprising 48 units .

The questions to be determined were:

1 Whether the following items complied with the Building Code:

  • The monolithic and rusticated Cedar weatherboard wall;
  • The roof claddings;
  • The finished ground levels and secondary flow paths;

2 Whether all building elements, incorporated in the complex, complied with clause B2 of the Building Code, considering the age of the construction.

The applicant in its submissions also requested that the determination address the issues of the acceptability of producer statements and the veracity of certifiers inspection records. The determination process as set out in the Act does not allow a determination of these questions.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
2006/004: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for 48 dwellings with monolithic and weatherboard cladding systems
Description

The application arose because the territorial authority did not issue a code compliance certificate for a 5-year-old complex comprising 48 units .

The questions to be determined were:

1 Whether the following items complied with the Building Code:

  • The monolithic and rusticated Cedar weatherboard wall;
  • The roof claddings;
  • The finished ground levels and secondary flow paths;

2 Whether all building elements, incorporated in the complex, complied with clause B2 of the Building Code, considering the age of the construction.

The applicant in its submissions also requested that the determination address the issues of the acceptability of producer statements and the veracity of certifiers inspection records. The determination process as set out in the Act does not allow a determination of these questions.

View on Information Provider website Download this resource (PDF, 0KB)
This resource does not cite any other resources.

2006/004: Refusal of a code compliance certificate for 48 dwellings with monolithic and weatherboard cladding systems

This resource does not CITE any other resources.
Feedback